| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |

Nairobi al-Kashmir
Republic University Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2016.06.29 10:35:00 -
[1] - Quote
I like the docking and especially the undocking camera a lot.
I wished for something like this for a long time, and I think you could even have gone a bit further with this.
The undocking "cinematic" is nice because it gives an even nicer impression about the size of the ship and station. Well done!
Please do not just remove this feature because a vocal minority is demanding so. There surely are people who do enjoy this feature but they're just no forum-dwellers, nor are they very vocal.
Instead just consider to make this docking / undocking feature optional. This way those who like it can keep it, and those who don't can disable it. |

Nairobi al-Kashmir
Republic University Minmatar Republic
4
|
Posted - 2016.06.29 16:32:51 -
[2] - Quote
Sulfurblade wrote:Vocal Minority???
Your literally the first person I have heard say anything remotely positive about this in help chat today there was a very common theme people who never enter the channel asking the same two questions!
1) How do I remove the new docking annimation... The question was asked more times then there are Sub's in the Eve Universe!
2) What happened to the 10,000 SP feature where did it go why did they take it away?!?
I really think your very out of touch with the majority on this particular issue!!!
It is well documented that people who like X are less likely to voice it. It is those who dislike X who are vocal. This gives the wrong perception that a majority dislikes a feature or product (even more so if that vocal minority is of ones own opinion).
A person that loves feature or product X is not going to call the customer-service to tell them how awesome it is. It is those who dislike the feature or the product that voice it.
100 people complaining about feature or product X might be a lot, but it's still a minority in comparison to the entriet of people who use the feature / product.
Your "I've heard many say X or Y therefore it must be true" is a very poor argumentation to make your point, sorry to break it on you.
And besides, with hyperbole like yours (see your quote), you cannot be taken seriously anyway. Especially not if in this very thread are people with a positive or at least neutral opinion on said feature (and yet you claim to never have heard it).
So I guess you have to listen a bit closer (or actually read the comments) and not only register the people who are of the same opinion as you.
Talking about out of touch...
|

Nairobi al-Kashmir
Republic University Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2016.06.29 18:05:39 -
[3] - Quote
I did not argue that you (and others) dislike the feature for various reasons. And it is good that you are voicing this in the forums (hopefully in a constructive and respectful way).
I am not opposed to your opinion. Not at all. I even support the idea of an option to toggle off the docking / undocking feature in order to please people like you as well, as your concerns are valid, too.
My reply that you quoted was not to go against the complaints. My post was a reply to the person who made silly argumentations and false accusations. |

Nairobi al-Kashmir
Republic University Minmatar Republic
5
|
Posted - 2016.06.29 18:53:21 -
[4] - Quote
Crosi Wesdo wrote:Nairobi al-Kashmir wrote:I did not argue that you (and others) dislike the feature for various reasons. And it is good that you are voicing this in the forums (hopefully in a constructive and respectful way). I am not opposed to your opinion. Not at all. I even support the idea of an option to toggle off the docking / undocking feature in order to please people like you as well, as your concerns are valid, too. My reply that you quoted was not to go against the complaints. My post was a reply to the person who made silly argumentations and false accusations. So you were looking for some kind of self validation through some armchair forum moderation? Thats very productive.
Not at all. Not sure how you come to that conclusion.
|
| |
|